I’ve been told that they’ve already been showing trailers for ‘Harlots, Housewives and Heroines’ starting May 22nd on BBC4 at 9pm: this is the official BBC explanation of what it’s all about.

‘In this new three-part series historian and Chief Curator of Historic Royal Palaces Dr Lucy Worsley immerses herself in the world of Restoration England, exploring the captivating lives of the women of the period.

The years after the Civil War and the Restoration of Charles II marked the end of the medieval era and the beginning of the modern age. These were exciting times for women, some of whom displayed remarkably modern attitudes and ambitions, achieving wealth, celebrity and power in ways that still look outstanding by 21st century standards. But these women also faced a world that was predominantly male, misogynistic and medieval in its outlook.

In the first episode Lucy investigates the lives of women at the top: the King’s mistresses at the Royal Court. When Charles and his entourage returned from exile they came back with a host of continental ideas, and as a result some of the women at court rose to prominence as never before, gaining unprecedented political influence and independence.

Amongst a fascinating cast of female characters, the most astonishing were Charles II’s own mistresses: the Royalist, Barbara Villiers, the French spy Louise de Keroualle and the infamous Cockney actress, Nell Gwynn.

Lucy examines the lives of these women, discovering how their fortunes were shaped by the Restoration and how their stories reflect the atmosphere of these extraordinary years. As she discovers, these women were key Restoration players, but as mistresses were truly in charge of their own destinies – or simply part of the world’s oldest profession?’

Posted in Hampton Court, Restoration Women | Leave a comment

This portrait was notable as the first time I’ve ever worn false eye-lashes – and it could well be the last time too, nasty spidery things they were!

‘Your Life’, Sainsbury’s Magazine, p. 25, June 2012

Having a sense of vocation is both lucky and valuable. When I was nineteen I visited a National Trust property in Salisbury called Mompesson House.  As I walked around, it suddenly hit me that people worked there, and I thought ‘that’s what I want to do’.

I like evidence that I’ve caused a changed in other people. I feel proudest when someone writes to me and says ‘I think history is more interesting now’ because of an exhibition I’ve done, a book I’ve written or a television programme I’ve made.

With effective time management, nothing should hold you back. That’s something my mother has taught me.  She’s fearsomely efficient and, put in charge of something, she’ll shake it up and improve it in no time at all.

Getting a good work-life balance depends on your definition. A lot of people would say I have a dreadful one, but when I’m sitting in the British Library on a Saturday morning researching, I’m really enjoying myself.

When I’m working, I aim to get into ‘the flow’, a state of being where I’m so absorbed in what I’m doing that I don’t notice the passage of time and don’t want to stop.

Getting out and exercising can help to solve anything, as far as I’m concerned. I hope I never had a problem that doesn’t look smaller after an hour of running and an hour of yoga.

Posted in A curator's life, Hampton Court | Leave a comment

This coming Wednesday, 2 May, on BBC2, at 8pm, our new series ‘Antiques Uncovered’ begins.  So here’s what it’s all about, in a really nice article from BBC Homes and Antiques Magazine, by Rosanna Morris.

A new TV series starring Roadshow expert Mark Hill and historian Lucy Worsley looks at antiques not simply for their value, but for the fascinating social history behind them.

As Chief Curator looking after Hampton Court Palace, the Tower of London and Banqueting House, there’s no such thing as a typical day for Lucy Worsley.  And since she started making history programmes for TV, things have got even stranger – she’s been filming swimming in a regency costume, cooking a hedgehog on a spit, washing Tudor linen in urine and making Victorian jelly.

Her latest venture, which she co-presented with Antiques Roadshow expert Mark Hill, is no exception.  In the last few weeks she’s made a leg for a Chippendale chair, driven a locomotive, had a lesson in high Victorian dining etiquette and sampled absinthe (‘it wasn’t all that nice’, she says). Mark, too, has had his fair share of the fun, watching chandeliers being made, studying Donald McGill’s saucy seaside postcards and bidding at auction.  And they’ve both spent a fair few hours playing slot machines on Southport pier during which Mark won some metallic purple lip gloss.  ’We were looking at the great British working class day out’, explains Lucy.

It’s all for their new show Antiques Uncovered which airs this May on BBC Two and aims to look at antiques in a whole new light. Rather than focusing solely on the object’s values, the three programmes, which have travel, entertaining and ceremony as their themes, seek to set the objects in their social historical context.

‘It’s easy to simply put something on a shelf and gasp at its value but we forget these pieces were made for a reason and designed to be enjoyed’, says Mark during a break in filming. ‘Some TV shows focus on antiques as commodities but they are more than that.  Through them we can gain a snapshot of our history.’ So a Brownie camera, for example, is not just discussed in terms of its worth, but in terms of why it was invented, the fashion it set, and who might have bought it at the time. And a Georgian chandelier is revealed to be much more than just a light. ‘Yes, it was designed to illuminate cavernous rooms but it was also a display of wealth, a statement of your success’, says Mark. ‘It was Georgian bling’.

Talking of bling, I join Mark and Lucy on location in prestigious jewellery shop SJ Phillips on London’s New Bond Street, where Lucy has slipped a seriously sparkly 1920s art deco rock on her ring finger. We’re about to shoot part of the programme about ceremony. Mark and Lucy are discussing weddings and the history and meaning of rings, examining a pair of acrostic examples designed to communicate secret messages. Cameras roll, director Neil Ferguson calls ‘action!’ and Mark starts speaking: ‘We’ve talked a lot about the language of jewellery and this is language in jewellery’, he says. ‘This particular arrangement of stones spells out a word with the first letter of every stone. We have a diamond, emerald, amethyst, ruby, emerald, sapphire and topaz, which is ‘dearest’, and this one, with its ruby, emerald, garnet, amethyst, ruby and diamond is ‘regard’. There was a great fashion for these in the 19th century.’

Fast forward a few hours and the pair are standing in front of Westminster Abbey filming a slot on coronations and royal memorabilia. ‘Ceramics are at the core of royal memorabilia’, says Mark to Lucy before going to tell the tale of a CT Maling cup produced for the coronation of Edward VII and Queen Alexandra in 1902. It bears the date 26th June even though Edward wasn’t in fact crowned until 9th august due to a bout of appendicitis. The cups with the later date are rare and more collectable.

Lucy pulls out a souvenir mug from Will and Kate’s wedding. ‘And what might this be worth?’ she asks, playfully. ‘Probably about the same as the tea you’re going to put in it,’ Mark replies.

The due work well together; Lucy with her mischievous flair, Mark with his wonderfully pronounced adjectives such as ‘gorgeous’ and ‘ingenious’ that we’ve all come to love on the Roadshow. Their rapport is particularly well illustrated during the last call of the day outside the Royal Festival Hall on London’s South Bank. Lucy bounds up to find Mark sitting in an Ernest Race ‘Antelope’ chair. He tells her how this piece of furniture, with its molecular shape, optimistic primary colour and new-fangled materials, encapsulated the spirit of the Festival of Britain in 1951. ‘Why Antelope?’ asks Lucy. ‘Is it because it looks like it can go “boing” [she leaps in front of the camera] on its legs?’ Ah, the things you have to do for TV…’

Antiques Uncovered, Wednesday 2nd May, BBC Two, 8pm

Posted in A curator's life, Antiques Uncovered | 1 Comment

On Wednesday, Channel 4 are showing (9 pm) what promises to be an interesting documentary about Queen Victoria’s Indian servant Abdul Karim.  I haven’t seen the finished thing, but believe my interview’s included.  If you can get past the general Mail-ishness of this article, published today, it does explain what the programme’s about…

Mary Greene on ‘Victoria’s secret crush: how Queen fell under the spell of Indian servant after death of ghillie companion John Brown’.

‘Just imagine. It’s the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee year, the eyes of the world are on London… and the Prince of Wales threatens to have his mother declared insane.

Unthinkable? Well, that’s what happened to Queen Victoria in 1897 after her Royal Household refused to condone any longer Her Majesty’s shockingly intimate friendship with an Indian servant.

It was a relationship that violated Victorian taboos of race and class, and threatened to destabilise the monarchy and the Empire – yet, although Queen Victoria’s earlier scandalous relationship with her Scottish ghillie [an outdoor servant] John Brown is still common knowledge today, her deep affection for her Muslim servant has been almost forgotten.

A new Channel 4 documentary, Queen Victoria’s Last Love, rediscovers how, as courtiers plotted to depose the royal favourite, the nation’s Jubilee celebrations teetered on the brink of chaos.

The story began a decade previously, in June 1887, when tall, handsome Abdul Karim, aged only 24, arrived at court as a ‘khitmagar’, one of two Indian servants recruited as waiters at the Queen’s table. Queen Victoria, in her Golden Jubilee year, was 68 and had never recovered from the loss of her dear Albert some 26 years earlier; moreover, her only other close male confidant, John Brown, had died in 1883. The Queen was lonely and in need of male companionship.

‘When he first appeared at court, Abdul looked wonderful in his gorgeous sashes and turbans,’ explains royal biographer Professor Jane Ridley. (Unfortunately, he later became rather fat.) ‘Queen Victoria always had a great appreciation of male beauty. So when she saw him, kissing her feet… how could she resist?’

Within weeks Karim was well on the way to becoming rather more than an ordinary dining-room servant.  Kitchen archives at the Queen’s favourite residence, Osborne House on the Isle of Wight, reveal that curries featured on the menu every Sunday lunchtime.

‘Had some excellent curry, prepared by one of my Indian servants,’ the Queen remarked in her diary later that summer. ‘We know that Abdul Karim and the Indian attendants prepared the meat, procured their own spices and were given a corner of the main kitchen to prepare these authentic curry dishes,’ says Michael Hunter, the curator at Osborne House. Meanwhile, Karim regaled the Queen and Empress, who had never visited India, with stories and legends from the land that was the exotic jewel in her crown.

Soon he was teaching her Hindustani, having somehow led the Queen to believe he was a man of some education. ‘Young Abdul teaches me,’ she wrote in her diary. ‘He is a very strict master and a perfect gentleman.’ From then until the end of her life, the elderly Queen kept a daily record of her studies and proved an adept pupil, writing in a neat Hindi hand. Karim became her ‘Munshi’, the Hindi word for teacher.

But their translation exercise books betray a more flirtatious relationship. Lucy Worsley, curator of the Historic Royal Palaces, says, ‘He wrote things like, “The Queen will miss the Munshi very much. Translate. Hold me tight. Translate.” It does seem quite personal and intimate.’ The Queen seemed to think of Karim almost as a son, affectionately signing letters to him as ‘your loving mother’.

Her indiscreet affection caused consternation among the Royal Household, led by the Queen’s private secretary Sir Henry Ponsonby and her doctor Sir James Reid, who resented the ambitious young Indian upstart who was breaching all protocol. ‘The Household had never been used to Indian servants,’ explains the present-day Lady Reid, who married the royal doctor’s grandson. ‘The Queen was always worrying about their comfort and Sir James had to have special tweeds made for them in Indian styles because she wanted them to look exotic.’

The courtiers’ resentment came to a head after the Queen promoted Karim to Indian Secretary. Even the Viceroy – the Earl of Elgin – was nonplussed after receiving an ingratiating Christmas card from the Munshi in 1894, only to be rebuked by the Queen for snubbing her favourite when he failed to reciprocate. It wasn’t simply racism; there was no code of etiquette that enabled a Viceroy to hobnob with servants. (Victoria, however, had no racial prejudice and had adopted a little African girl in 1850, providing her with an education and a generous £250 trousseau when she married.)

The Viceroy now despatched his aide-de-camp – Fritz Ponsonby, son of the Queen’s private secretary – to make some overdue inquiries in Karim’s home town of Agra. The Munshi had given the impression that he was the son of an Indian army surgeon. In fact, he came from a much lowlier background. His father was an apothecary at the local prison, where Karim himself had previously been employed as a clerk. It fell upon Sir James Reid to deliver a blistering put-down: ‘By your presumption and arrogance you have created for yourself a situation that can no longer be permitted to exist,’ he thundered. ‘You are an impostor. You are from a low class and never can be a gentleman.’

The Queen was livid. ‘To make out the Munshi is low is really outrageous,’ she protested in a memo to Sir Henry. To everybody’s horror, she now wanted to bestow a knighthood on him. Victoria was in danger of undermining the monarchy itself, devaluing all the trappings of Empire if a prison worker’s son could rise to  such an exalted position.

On the eve of the Diamond Jubilee, she even threatened to pull out of the celebrations. The Royal Household delivered an ultimatum, triggered by Dr Reid’s revelation – in an extraordinary breach of professional etiquette –that Karim had contracted a venereal disease. Courtiers threatened to resign rather than allow the Munshi to accompany them on a royal holiday in France. In a fit of rage, the Queen swept everything off her desk.

But then her son Bertie, the Prince of Wales, conspired with Dr Reid and encouraged him to deliver another ultimatum. ‘There are people in high places who know Your Majesty well,’ threatened the brave Scottish doctor when he faced her next day, ‘Who say to me that the only charitable explanation that can be given is that Your Majesty is not sane, and that the time will come when, to save Your Majesty’s memory and reputation, it will be necessary for me to come forward and say so.’

The threat hit home and Queen Victoria was forced to concede defeat. There would be no knighthood for Karim, although he remained at her side throughout the celebrations. However,  when she died, in 1901, he was dismissed from Court – just days after attending her funeral – and sent back to India. All his letters and mementos from the Queen were confiscated and destroyed: the new King Edward VII did not look kindly on the Indian servant who had been the last great love of Queen Victoria’s life.’

Queen Victoria’s Last Love is on Wednesday at 9pm on Channel 4.

Posted in A curator's life, Kensington Palace | 2 Comments

Yesterday I was pleased and proud to have been asked to open the new exhibition at Ware Museum, Hertfordshire. They’ve got back their Great Bed on loan, for a year, from the Victoria and Albert Museum.

Make sure you don’t miss seeing it in its home town! It was a glorious day, Ware’s church-bells were ringing, there was a specially-composed fanfare played, and about 100 people, many in Tudor costume, toasted the trustees and volunteers of Ware Museum in mead to recognise their great achievement in organising all this.

They were also unbelievably kind in presenting me with something they thought I’d like – and I did – a specially customised ‘Great Bed of Ware’ chamberpot.  (Currently sharing house room at mine with a warming pan used the other day in a film about the ‘Warming Pan Incident’ which led to the so-called ‘Glorious’ Revolution of 1688.)

Read all about this amazing project in Mark Bell’s article for The Guardian

Shakespeare used it as a byword for huge size and 26 butchers and their wives allegedly spent the night in it for a bet in 1689. Now the enormous Tudor bed that has been a centrepiece of the Victoria and Albert Museum for more than 80 years has a new temporary home.

The piece of furniture in question is the Great Bed of Ware, which has left South Kensington to take pride of place in the tiny museum of its Hertfordshire home town for a year.

Moving it was a huge logistical challenge from which emerged a surprise: hitherto unknown graffiti from 18th- and 19th-century admirers wanting to leave their mark on the bed.

Kate Hay, a curator in the V&A‘s furniture department, said the discovery of the graffiti – more than 20 scrawled names and initials – came about because of the laborious process of dismantling and packing up the three-metre-wide, 641kg (almost 101st) bed, which took around six days, followed by nine days getting it to a newly constructed extension at Ware Museum.

Just getting it out of the V&A was problematic, requiring 10 strapping carriers and an unconventional exit route, avoiding narrow doors and corridors.

Martin Roth, the V&A’s director, said the bed was “one of the V&A’s most loved exhibits and has never been off display since it was acquired in 1931″.

He added: “To remove the bed from the British galleries, transport it and reinstall it in another location is unprecedented, requiring much skill and dedication. We hope that the people of Ware will enjoy visiting this historic bed and that it will bring their local history alive.”

The bed was made in the 1590s, probably by German craftsmen in Southwark and presumably for an inn owner in Ware – an hour’s ride from London and packed with places to stay – who wanted to make a name for himself.

Its existence was first recorded in 1596 by a travelling German prince staying at the White Hart. The bed obviously achieved fame because five years later Shakespeare has Sir Toby Belch in Twelfth Night describe a sheet of paper as “big enough for the Bed of Ware”. It was referenced in Ben Jonson’s 1609 play The Silent Woman and in George Farquhar’s 1706 play The Recruiting Officer, in which a bed is “bigger by half than the Great Bed of Ware”.

For most of its life the bed has been an attraction rather than a sleeping place – a repeat of the 26 butchers’ exploits is not something that would be countenanced these days, the V&A stresses.

The bed was passed around several Ware inns before it moved a pleasure garden in nearby Hoddesdon towards the end of the 19th century, becoming a bank holiday attraction during the boom in rail travel.

The V&A did consider buying the bed in 1860, but its hand was finally forced in 1931 when it looked as though it was heading to an American buyer at auction. The V&A stepped in to buy it for £4,000, which proved good value – the bed has always been high on the list of the museum’s most popular objects.

Hay said: “It’s such a memorable sight to see a bed this size. It is something that people who don’t know an awful lot about the museum have heard of.”

The Ware display will be officially opened on Saturday by Lucy Worsley, chief curator at Historic Royal Palaces. An award of £229,000 from the Heritage Lottery Fund helped the Ware Museum Trust put the bed on display.

“We’re just so proud that we’ve all managed to do it,” said Janet Watson, a trustee of the museum for 25 years. “To co-operate with the V&A on such a big project is absolutely amazing. We’re still pinching ourselves – we can’t believe it’s here.”

Posted in A curator's life | 2 Comments

Hello, I do hope you’ll come and see our new exhibition ‘The Wild The Beautiful and The Damned’ at Hampton Court, about beauty, sex and power at the court of Charles II.

Here’s a little interview about it which I did for The Today Programme on Radio 4 last week, and here’s a Sunday Times interview for a bit more detail…  (NB health warning: don’t read this unless you are a True Fan.  It’s very flattering, and may cause annoyance…)

The Sunday Times, News Review, 8 April 2012.

The palace curator likes to get down and dirty bringing history to life on TV. Giles Hattersley’s News Review interview.

Lucy Worsley tips up at a restaurant near London’s South Bank looking exactly as you would imagine: chirpy, quick-witted, with a face like a Bennet sister and trailing several suitcases full of period costumes.  ‘Hello’, the historian says, cheerily.  ‘I’ve just had a day of being a 17th-century yeoman’s housewife’.

Well, of course she has.  Worsley has been filming her latest television programme on Restoration women, so, as per, she also rode a horse, got trussed up like a witch and sported a scold’s bridle. ‘Horrible … who wore it before?’ Odd to think that this diminutive 38-year old has a serious day job as chief curator of historical palaces.

It has been a busy few weeks.  She has just redone the jewel room at the Tower of London, before unveiling the seven-year £12m revamp of Kensington Palace.  Somehow she also found time to appear on Our Food last week, a new television programme celebrating British produce, where she stole the show ‘de-gassing’ turkeys the old-fashion way (Google it for a giggle).

It is all part of winning schtick.  In the past couple of years Worsley seems to have wrestled history TV from being po-faced (David Starkey) or pure froth (The 1900 House).  Landing somewhere in the middle, she loves a stunt, getting down and dirty with the day-to-day of have we used to live.

‘I don’t mind losing my dignity’, she says, her voice less crazily posh than on the box.  To that end she has washed her clothes in urine, slept in tiny medieval beds and even done Henry VIII’s weekly shop (she could barely get the ale-laden trolley around the supermarket).

Some have not warmed to her.  When she was dressed in full period regalia, traipsing through London, a passer-by once yelled ‘F*** off, Little Bo Peep’. Predictably others – such as Starkey – have sniffed.  He branded her approach ‘historical Mills and Boon’, but it hasn’t put her off. ‘I am a believer that you can learn a lot form tiny bits of detritus about people’s lives’, she says.

Many agree and fans are multiplying.  Could she be entering Gareth Malone territory? She has that allure of the overgrown undergrad, the sort to elicit shy glances from clever boys in the Bodleian. One admirer summed up feelings when he blogged: ‘I don’t think I’m alone in finding myself a little in love with the wonderful Lucy and her jolly hockey sticks demeanour’. She admits she has had ‘several amusing marriage proposals’.

All this is vanilla, though, next to her latest project.  Last week saw the opening of her, and the curator Brett Dolman’s, new exhibition at Hampton Court Palace: ‘The Wild, The Beautiful and The Damned’. Exploring the saucier side of the late Stuart court – where mistresses such as Barbara Villiers and Nell Gwynn ruled hearts and loins – it’s enough to make Ashley Cole blush.

How Charles II held his kingdom together post-Cromwell, what with his exhaustive schedule of threesomes and looming syphilis, is anyone’s guess.  What’s so canny about Dolman’s and Worsley’s take is that through portraiture and knick-knacks the focus is placed on the mistresses, whom she refuses to write off as mere wily sluts.

‘Women used their brains and their bodies to succeed’, she says. ‘The ideal of femininity is pretty passive in the 17th century, but what we see at the court of Charles II for the first time is the mistresses taking centre stage.  They had influence.  Real political influence.  Barbara Villiers – who was top mistresses for ages – ended up with Hampton Court Palace.  That’s her retirement home.  She gets financial security, a title for her son and she is unfaithful to the king himself.  She has the confidence to do that.  Amazingly impressive’.

Worsley is compelling in full steam, all clever half-smiles and academic in-jokes.  You might not guess that the crinoline cutie hails from an unlikely locale: Reading. (‘Not great, but it could have been Slough,’ she says in her online biog.) Her father, a geologist, is retired emeritus professor at Reading University, but her blue-stocking yearnings did not go unquestioned. Apparently history was small beer in the brainy Worsley household, an academic frippery unlikely to win one a job in the real world.

‘My dad is a scientist’, she says. ‘He believes it’s really important to try and stop global warming and cure cancer – as it is – and I respect him for that’. She tried to toe the line, but managed only a term of A-level sciences before switching to her true love. She won a place to read history at New College, Oxford, although she got chucked out for bad behaviour and failed her degree. I jest. Obviously, she fot a first and one imagines she was a don’s delight.

After a starter job on the stately home circuit, feeding llamas and shushing school pupils at Milton Manor in Oxfordshire, she followed it up with a doctorate in art history at Sussex.

So far, so jolly. But her career trajectory since then suggests there is something of the steel pixie about Worsley. In 1997 she joined English Heritage, rising quickly to the rank of inspector of ancient monuments and historic buildings. In 2003, at the grand old age of 29, she bagged her current job at the historic palaces.

Clearly, brilliance played its part.  But forgive the sweeping stereotype, I say, isn’t your profession rather dominated by crusty old men? Was it tough getting the top job so young? ‘Well, I interviewed’, she says, simply. Did she ever face ageism or sexism in the heritage biz? If she has, she hasn’t noticed – or isn’t telling.

‘I’m a child of the 1970s. My mother brought me up to think I could do anything I wanted’. Part of this has meant ‘self-electing’ not to have children, as she is joyously in thrall to her work.  Although her home with her boyfriend –Mark Hines, an award-winning architect – is not what you might envisage. She lives in a sleek, modern apartment on London’s riverside, a necessary antidote to all those sooty palaces.

Her worlds can sometimes collide, such as when she tried using ground-up cuttlefish bones as toothpaste for a television programme. ‘The researcher left it with my doorman’, she says, laughing. ‘He called up and said, ‘A gentleman has delivered a bag of white powder for you’. I had to quickly explain that it was only for my teeth’.

She is not averse to dipping into her history books in the kitchen, however: ‘Last week I made some of Elizabeth Dysart’s elixir. She was said to be the lover of Oliver Cromwell, while at the same time working as a spy for the exiled Charles II. She kept a good recipe book, including this all-purpose curative’.

So Worsley, in her trendy urban kitchen, merrily cooked up hyssop, cloves, aniseed and masses of brandy, as you do. How was it “Fabulous’, she says. ‘It would have brought the dead back to life’.

Normally she is more of a mojito girl, despite the conception that she ‘has tea with the Queen every day’. If not every day, how often? ‘I’ve never had tea with her, but I’ve met her a few times’. And what about Kate and Wills, her future tenants at Kensington Palace, has she met them? ‘Maybe’. Nice guys? ‘Maybe’, she says, smiling.

How are you getting on with Starkey these days? This question prompts several seconds of silence. ‘I can’t remember when I last saw him’, she says, eventually, ‘but if he were to walk in now we’d have a nice chat’. Yeah, right.

This Starkey tiff touches on Worsley’s one problem – one that is arguably her greatest virtue, too. She is an unapologetic populist. Is it true she gave a talk to the National Trust saying she wanted history to be as big as The X Factor?

‘That is genuinely what I would like to see. Though when I said that, one of my fellow curators came and told me off. He said ‘History is as popular as The X Factor – 13m people watch it and there are at least 13m people already interested in history in this country’.

A fair point, but Worlsey thinks more pizzazz is needed. Could she be the woman to provide it? With two more shows for the BBC already lined up, the signs look good. She is clearly thrilled by her ascent – in a demure sort of way, of course.

‘I am a shy show-off’, she says, nailing her appeal.  It’s a tantalizing mix.

Our Food continues on BBC2 on Wednesday at 8pm.

Posted in Hampton Court, Restoration Women | 4 Comments